AtDeathDoor
18/11/2008, 20:31
Fui passando de link em link, site por site, até chegar a essa notícia.
Tem um pequeno spoiler sobre Kannagi, é leve, mas melhor prevenir.
Como vocês souberam recentemente, existe uma petição atual clamando pelo direito dos fâs se casaram com personagens de anime/mangá.
Vocês que conhecem o meio devem saber da preferência dos fãs por personagens puras. O problema surgiu com a revelação de a protagonista Nagi não ser, de fato "pura".
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/wp-content/gallery/cache/18255__448x_kannagiero-35.jpg
The revelation that flat goddess Nagi-sama (http://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/index?tags=nagi-sama), of Kannagi (http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2008/10/19/kannagi-%E2%80%93-nagi-yuri-raep-anime/), had a boyfriend and thus may not in fact be a virgin has provoked a storm of outrage on 2ch, with obsessive fans vowing to throw out their manga, cancel their dakimakura orders (http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2008/10/20/kannagi-nagi-petankura/), etc. Otaku viciously proclaim they have no need of a “second-hand” wife.
Others hold this to be the era of Zange-chan (http://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/index?tags=zange-chan), available for a mere ¥100 a go (http://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/16462/kannagi-oshiri-zange-chan)…
The problem stems from a few lines in the latest chapter:
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/wp-content/gallery/misc-images-v/iup724232.jpg
There’s no need to go into spoiling detail on the rest (not that there really is any).
Their histrionics are seen as all the more ridiculous considering no actual allusion to sex has even been made, just the introduction of an “ex-boyfriend character”.
It is also noted that those complaining are the main audience for all manner of interesting doujin works… (http://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/17172/)
About the only worthwhile point raised is that the timing of such a revelation (if indeed it is such, and not merely the obsessive ravings of a thousand NEET virgin hunters) seems odd, given that it arrives just in time to coincide with the DVD release (http://www.play-asia.com/SOap-23-83-bf73-71-a7-49-en-15-kannagi-84-j-70-2y4y-43-9.html) and therefore have a deleterious effect on sales, assuming such otaku are numerous enough to have an impact. Possibly there is some mistake?
Another interesting point raised is that for a thousand-year-old goddess to be a virgin might just be the more objectionable, though perhaps not to otaku.
You can read the relevant portions of the thread here (http://blog.livedoor.jp/goldennews/archives/51176821.html).
Perhaps these wretches would like to file for a virtual divorce (http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2008/10/29/otaku-demand-right-to-wed-2d-characters/)?
Fonte:http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2008/11/10/“second-hand”-nagi-provokes-otaku-storm/
Detalhe para esse link: http://blog.livedoor.jp/goldennews/archives/51176821.html
Por mais que tente não consigo entender nada, mas os desenhos ASCII são foda:smile
Minha opinão
Acho que as pessoas que reclamaram realmente tem um sério problema de discernimento.
Como assim não querer uma "ESPOSA de segunda-mão"?
Eles entram mesmo no personagem, identificação suprema.
Eu acho saudável ler algo criticamente. Aquele tipo de história é para relaxar, sei disso, mas é bom para para pensar, "essa cena poderia ser melhor", ou "isso foi idota", por aí.
Fica difícil argumentar com mais profundidade pois não consigo pensar como esses otakus e me ofender com algo assim.
Ciao
Tem um pequeno spoiler sobre Kannagi, é leve, mas melhor prevenir.
Como vocês souberam recentemente, existe uma petição atual clamando pelo direito dos fâs se casaram com personagens de anime/mangá.
Vocês que conhecem o meio devem saber da preferência dos fãs por personagens puras. O problema surgiu com a revelação de a protagonista Nagi não ser, de fato "pura".
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/wp-content/gallery/cache/18255__448x_kannagiero-35.jpg
The revelation that flat goddess Nagi-sama (http://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/index?tags=nagi-sama), of Kannagi (http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2008/10/19/kannagi-%E2%80%93-nagi-yuri-raep-anime/), had a boyfriend and thus may not in fact be a virgin has provoked a storm of outrage on 2ch, with obsessive fans vowing to throw out their manga, cancel their dakimakura orders (http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2008/10/20/kannagi-nagi-petankura/), etc. Otaku viciously proclaim they have no need of a “second-hand” wife.
Others hold this to be the era of Zange-chan (http://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/index?tags=zange-chan), available for a mere ¥100 a go (http://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/16462/kannagi-oshiri-zange-chan)…
The problem stems from a few lines in the latest chapter:
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/wp-content/gallery/misc-images-v/iup724232.jpg
There’s no need to go into spoiling detail on the rest (not that there really is any).
Their histrionics are seen as all the more ridiculous considering no actual allusion to sex has even been made, just the introduction of an “ex-boyfriend character”.
It is also noted that those complaining are the main audience for all manner of interesting doujin works… (http://chan.sankakucomplex.com/post/show/17172/)
About the only worthwhile point raised is that the timing of such a revelation (if indeed it is such, and not merely the obsessive ravings of a thousand NEET virgin hunters) seems odd, given that it arrives just in time to coincide with the DVD release (http://www.play-asia.com/SOap-23-83-bf73-71-a7-49-en-15-kannagi-84-j-70-2y4y-43-9.html) and therefore have a deleterious effect on sales, assuming such otaku are numerous enough to have an impact. Possibly there is some mistake?
Another interesting point raised is that for a thousand-year-old goddess to be a virgin might just be the more objectionable, though perhaps not to otaku.
You can read the relevant portions of the thread here (http://blog.livedoor.jp/goldennews/archives/51176821.html).
Perhaps these wretches would like to file for a virtual divorce (http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2008/10/29/otaku-demand-right-to-wed-2d-characters/)?
Fonte:http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2008/11/10/“second-hand”-nagi-provokes-otaku-storm/
Detalhe para esse link: http://blog.livedoor.jp/goldennews/archives/51176821.html
Por mais que tente não consigo entender nada, mas os desenhos ASCII são foda:smile
Minha opinão
Acho que as pessoas que reclamaram realmente tem um sério problema de discernimento.
Como assim não querer uma "ESPOSA de segunda-mão"?
Eles entram mesmo no personagem, identificação suprema.
Eu acho saudável ler algo criticamente. Aquele tipo de história é para relaxar, sei disso, mas é bom para para pensar, "essa cena poderia ser melhor", ou "isso foi idota", por aí.
Fica difícil argumentar com mais profundidade pois não consigo pensar como esses otakus e me ofender com algo assim.
Ciao